Tip: Take care when crafting queries for angina
CDI Strategies, June 24, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Despite some misconceptions to the contrary, a coder may report angina, unstable (411.1) if a physician documents any of the following diagnoses and a query is not required:
- Progressive angina
- Accelerated angina
- Initial (new onset) angina
Since angina unspecified is not a CC, some CDI specialists query physicians using terms such as “unstable” or “preinfarction” angina, says William Haik, MD, FCCP, director of DRG Review, Inc., in Fort Walton Beach, FL. Physicians may balk at these queries and state that the patient does not qualify for these more severe types of angina. Haik recommends a different line of questioning.
“A softer term, such as progressive, accelerated, or new onset [initial] angina may be more appropriate, and all group under 411.1,” he says.
CDI specialists should suspect and, therefore, query for progressive/accelerated angina in patients with a known history of chronic angina whose chronic angina becomes accelerated (i.e., it occurs from less activity than is typical, Haik says).
In contrast, unstable angina requires aggressive physician intervention, such as treatments of IV nitroglycerine/ morphine. When a physician documents acute coronary syndrome (ACS), he or she may not mean that the patient has angina, even though ACS, according to coding guidelines, groups to 411.1.
“ACS is a spectrum of disease relating to ischemic heart disease—it could be a patient with unstable angina, or it could be a patient with an acute myocardial infarction,” notes Haik.
If a patient is admitted with acute chest pain and has elevated biomarkers such as elevated CPK or troponin levels, query the physician to further specify the ACS as a subendocardial or transmural myocardial infarction.
Editor’s note: This information first appeared in the CDI Journal article Tips for problematic complications and comorbidities, A–Z.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
