Q&A: HIPAA-compliant sign-in sheets
HIM Connection, June 8, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Q. Do patient sign-in sheets violate the HIPAA privacy rule? If they don’t, does a recommended format exist?
A. Covered entities are responsible for limiting incidental disclosure. Using a patient sign-in sheet may be perceived as not taking the necessary steps to limit incidental disclosure and a violation of the HIPAA privacy rule.
Also, if a significant number of patients receive treatment for specially protected mental or physical conditions, a sign-in sheet may inappropriately disclose a patient’s condition. This creates an even higher likelihood that a sign-in list violates state privacy laws and other more stringent federal privacy laws.
It is a good idea not to use a patient sign-in list. Covered entities that use one should reasonably ensure that they regularly replace signed sheets with blank sheets and not just cross out patient names. Crossing out the patients’ names usually does not make them unreadable.
No preferred format exists. However, covered entities that use a sign-in sheet should very strictly limit the PHI requested from patients who sign it.
Editor’s note: This question was answered by Chris Apgar, CISSP, president of Apgar & Associates, LLC, in Portland, OR, in the June issue of Briefings on HIPAA.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
