CMS addresses medical necessity reviews, RAC expansion in RAC 101 call
HIM Connection, May 18, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
CMS representatives addressed two developing recovery audit contractor (RAC) areas during the May 5 RAC 101 conference call for DMEPOS—forthcoming medical necessity reviews and RAC program expansion to Part C and Medicaid.
Providers might see medical necessity reviews “within the next month or so,” according to Scott Wakefield of CMS. “We don’t have a specific timeframe for it but it will begin soon.”
This is the agency’s most specific statement yet regarding medical necessity. Previously CMS only mentioned that these reviews will begin within calendar year 2010. The DRG validation issues that the RACs are now auditing specifically exclude medical necessity.
CMS also provided some insight into the expansion of the RAC program under the recently enacted Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Although the provision is currently at the HHS departmental level and CMS policy-makers have not yet heard whether the plan is to move the existing RACs into the new areas, Wakefield said that “it doesn’t appear that they will.”
Editor’s note: Visit HCPro’s Revenue Cycle Institute for the latest RAC information.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
