Q/A: Correct use of modifier -50
APCs Weekly Monitor, April 23, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Q: Can you explain use of CPT modifier -50, bilateral procedure and the reporting for outpatient surgery? Sometimes we understand and sometimes it is a mystery. What can we use to assist in this endeavor and remain compliant with OPPS guidelines?
A: First, understanding the narrative of CPT codes is important. Don’t report modifier -50 if a narrative states “one or both,” “bilateral,” or “unilateral or bilateral.” With that said, modifier-50 applies to any procedure performed on both sides during the same session. The best resource for understanding the proper reporting of modifier-50 for hospitals is the Outpatient Code Editor (OCE), specifically Appendix A (Bilateral Procedure Logic) and Appendix D (Computation of Discounting Fraction). Three OCE edits are dedicated to correct reporting of modifier -50:
- Edit 16—Multiple bilateral procedures without modifier -50
- Edit 17—Inappropriate specification of bilateral procedure
- Edit 74—Units greater than one for bilateral procedure with modifier -50
Each of these causes a “Return To Provider” (RTP) disposition of the claim.
CMS uses the Medicare Physicians’ Fee Schedule database to determine the correct application of modifier -50 for hospitals to ensure proper discounting and reimbursement. The column labeled “Bilateral Surgery Indicator” indicates whether you may report the procedure as a bilateral procedure. If there is a “0” in the column for the CPT code, Medicare does not allow reporting of modifier-50. If there is a “1” in the column for the CPT code, you may report modifier-50 and Medicare will recognize the procedure for bilateral reimbursement.
Procedure with status indicator “T” will be paid at 150% to account for the 50% reduction for the second procedure under the multiple procedure reduction rules. However, CMS uses a formula that results in 75% payment for each procedure. Procedures with a status indicator other than “T” will be paid at 200%.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
