Coding postop or post-traumatic infections with OR procedures
HIM Connection, April 13, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
RACs already are validating countless MS-DRGs in hospitals nationwide, and the number of eligible targets continues to grow. Coders should keep a watchful eye on these three MS-DGRs, which are among the list of approved audit issues for multiple RACs:
- 856 (postop or post-traumatic infection with operating room [OR] procedure with MCC)
- 857 (postop or post-traumatic infection with OR procedure with CC)
- 858 (postop or post-traumatic infection with OR procedure without CC or MCC)
Correct assignment of the principal diagnosis and/or principal procedure will keep RACs at bay, experts say. Take the time to know which conditions drive these MS-DRGs. The following conditions will yield MS-DRG 856, 857, or 858 when paired with an OR procedure:
- 958.3 (post-traumatic wound infection, not elsewhere classified)
- 998.51 (infection postop seroma)
- 998.59 (other postop infection)
- 999.39 (complications of medical care not elsewhere classified, infection following other infusion, injection, transfusion, or vaccination)
Before reporting one of the listed conditions, ensure that documentation supports that a patient truly has apostoperative infection,says Donna D. Wilson, RHIA, CCS, senior director at Compliance Concepts, Inc., in Wexford, PA.
For example, documentation may indicate that a patient has a postop fever, but this doesn’t necessarily mean coders should report 998.59. If the fever isn’t associated with a known infection, report 780.62 (post-procedural fever), which became effective October 1, 2008.
Similarly, don’t confuse seroma (i.e., a collection of clear fluid) with hematoma (i.e., a collection of blood), says Wilson. Reporting 998.51 could yield one of the previously listed MS-DRGs whereas reporting 998.12 (hematoma complicating a procedure) would not.
Editor’s note: For additional tips, see the April issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
