Covered entity gets requests for BA agreements
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, March 29, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Check out this provider’s question on HIPAA Update:
The facility I work at is a covered entity.
We continually receive requests to sign a business associate (BA) agreement from other covered entities we do routine business with.
Is there a statement or stated language in the HIPAA/HITECH that can be used to state to these covered entities that we do not need a BA agreement with the other covered entity because we are a covered entity?
It seems that BA documents are being used inappropriately, or as a “catch all, just in case” scenarios. And, if these are being used like this, is it safer in being compliant to just go ahead and sign the BA even though it is not needed?
If you want to weigh in, view the post on HIPAA Update.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
-
Guide to HIPAA Auditing, Second Edition
This new edition of a best-selling book delivers the hands-on tools and guidance you need to conduct effective in-house...
-
HIPAA Training Handbook for Business Associates
Train all of your staff members with this handbook and others in the 2009 HIPAA Handbook Series. Ensure they understand...
-
HIPAA Handbook for Executive, Administrative and Corporate Staff
Train all of your staff members with this handbook and others in the 2009 HIPAA Handbook Series. Ensure they understand...
-
The No-Hassle Guide to HIPAA Policies: A Privacy and Security Toolkit
HIPAA regulations require extensive documentation—likely more than you've done in the past. Changing the way you look...
-
The HIPAA and HITECH Toolkit
The HIPAA and HITECH Toolkit is a valuable resource that helps both CEs and BAs understand and meet the HITECH Act's...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched