Q/A: Using modifier -59 for EKGs
APCs Weekly Monitor, March 12, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Q: Should we use CPT modifier -59 (distinct procedural service) for a preoperative EKG performed on an outpatient the day of the primary procedure? And may we append it for a postoperative EKG is performed later in the day after an outpatient returns to his or her room?
A: Your question seems to address resolution of an NCCI edit between the EKG and another procedure. and whether you should automatically apply modifier -59 to the EKG to allow for separate APC payment from the other procedure
One cannot determine whether modifier -59 is appropriate for the EKG merely because it was performed preoperatively or postoperatively. You must analyze other factors, such as the physician order for the EKG, physician intent, and any clinical indications for the EKG. Did a complication develop postoperatively or was the EKG a routine or normal part of managing the care of the patient for the performed procedure?
Performance of any test, procedure, or service requires a medically necessary and documented reason. Modifier -59 may be appropriate if documentation in the record indicates that the EKG was ordered before the other procedure was scheduled and the EKG results were used to determine the medical need for the other procedure. Modifier -59 also may be appropriate if documentation indicates that the patient had a complication after the procedure and an EKG was appropriate to assess it.
However, without review of the actual documentation for the specific situation, we cannot make an exact determination.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
