Tip: Consider whether to provide voluntary ABN
APCs Weekly Monitor, March 12, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
CMS’ decision allowing facilities to voluntarily provide patients with an ABN for statutorily noncovered services forces hospitals to make a decision of their own. Should they provide the voluntary ABN or not?
Doing so will mean that facility staff members will have only one form to deal with instead of different notices for different services. The voluntary ABNs are another way to help patients with secondary insurance that may pay for part of a statutorily excluded service.
Not doing so might confuse some patients, requiring staff members to spend more time educating them about the ABN. Facilities may ultimately submit more claims to Medicare for statutorily noncovered services because patients check the ABN’s “Submit to Medicare” box. Another potential problem involves the -GA waiver of liability statement issued, as required by payer policy) and -GX (notice of liability issued, voluntary under payer policy) modifiers. Medicare will deny claims when coders and billers append the wrong modifier.
Staffing could ultimately determine whether you provide voluntary ABNs. Determine whether your registration staff can handle distribution of voluntary ABNs—you may not have sufficient resources to do so.
This tip was adapted from “Should you provide a voluntary ABN?” in the March issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
