Tip: Distinguish between orders, requisitions for diagnostic tests
APCs Weekly Monitor, February 12, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
In the 2010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule, CMS restates its self-described “long-standing” policy that requires ordering physicians or nonphysician practitioners to sign the written order for diagnostic tests such as x-rays and laboratory tests. CMS says its policy does not require signatures on requisitions for laboratory tests.
CMS defines an “order” as a communication from the treating physician or practitioner requesting that a laboratory perform a diagnostic test for a beneficiary. Orders may be conveyed via:
- A written document signed by the treating physician/practitioner that is hand delivered, mailed, or faxed to the treating facility
- A telephone call
- E-mail or other electronic means
CMS says a “requisition” is the actual paperwork, such as a form, that physicians provide clinical diagnostic laboratories to identify the test or tests they want performed. The requisition may contain details such as:
-
Patient information
-
Billing information
-
Specimen information
-
Test selection
CMS stated in the final rule that a requisition signed by a physician may serve as an order.
This tip is adapted from “CMS clarifies physician signatures needed on all lab orders” in the February issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
