HITECH Tip: Be aware of new restriction requests and marketing requirements
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, February 1, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Effective this month, if a patient goes to a physician or other provider and pays in full for treatment, a prescription, or durable medical equipment out of pocket, the patient may request that his or her medical information be restricted.
For example, if the patient requests that the provider not release that information to his or her insurer for payment or healthcare operations, the covered entity must honor that request, says Chris Apgar, CISSP, president of Apgar & Associates, LLC, in Portland, OR. In the past, the provider could tell the patient that he or she could request restrictions on the disclosure of information, but the covered entity did not have to agree to restrict access, he says.
Restriction requests may also be a challenge in the 40 states with pharmacy registries, he adds. The registries allow a physician to see certain prescriptions a patient is taking, including pain medications such as OxyContin®. If a patient pays out of pocket and requests that a pharmacist not report that information, federal law trumps the state requirements for reporting to pharmacy registries, Apgar says.
Editor’s note: This except is from the February edition of Briefings on HIPAA, HCPro, Inc.’s 12-page newsletter. To learn more about the newsletter or to purchase this article in full, please go to HCPro, Inc.’s Health Information Management page.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched