Tip: Know what documentation is necessary to code tumor excisions
APCs Weekly Monitor, January 29, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
The AMA made a significant number of changes to soft tissue and bone tumor excision codes for 2010. The new and revised codes categorize these tumor excisions by size of the tumor and by level of depth. Coders need enough accurate documentation to correctly code the procedures with the new levels of specificity. Physicians should answer the following questions clearly in their documentation:
How deep is the actual resection? The deepest layer of the resection will determine the correct code. If the excision goes only to the integumentary system, don’t use the musculoskeletal codes, use integumentary codes.
How complex is the procedure? Physicians must clearly indicate whether the procedure was an excision or resection. They also must specify whether the excision was radical, extensive, or simple.
What type of closure was performed? Remember that you can code only complex wound closures, not simple or intermediate. Coders also must look for documentation, noting any additional procedures the physician performed, and determine whether those are also billable.
How large was the excision? Size matters when selecting the proper code for tumor excisions, so ensure that the physician has documented the size of the excision.
This tip is adapted from “2010 CPT: Tumor excisions, facet joint injections among most significant changes” in the February issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
