Know when to report uncertain diagnoses
HIM Connection, January 19, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Coders may often wish they could read physicians’ minds when clinical documentation is lacking, but this superhuman power seems to exist only in books and movies. However, most coders probably would agree that the ability to read minds would be enormously helpful when deciding whether to report uncertain diagnoses. These are conditions for which physicians find clinical evidence that leads to a suspicion but not a definitive diagnosis.
The challenge for coders is that uncertain diagnoses often change or morph into something else during the hospital stay, says Glenn Krauss, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS,an independent consultant located in Madison, WI. Physicians don’t always document those changes, Krauss says. “Doctors don’t do a good job of telling us whether it’s ruled out. They change their thought process in the management of the patient and go down another path,” he explains.
Medical record documentation often reflects a physician’s complicated thought process that he or she undergoes before arriving at a final diagnosis, says James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, director of FTI Healthcare in Atlanta. Physicians often document a variety of potential diagnoses as part of their journey to a final diagnosis, says Kennedy. “Physicians are used to thinking out loud as they document in their records,” he says. Unless definitive evidence of a condition exists, physicians will document the condition with some degree of uncertainty, he explains.
Note: For more information, visit the HCPro Web site. Subscribers to Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies have access to this article in the January issue of the newsletter.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
