Renal failure coding tips
HIM Connection, January 12, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 26 million Americans, according to the National Kidney Foundation. As cases of hypertension and diabetes—the two most common causes of CKD—continue to rise nationwide, these statistics may become even more grim. Ensure detailed documentation of this condition and compliant coding with the following tips:
-
Don’t discount nonessential modifiers. In the absence of a specific stage of CKD, coders can use nonessential modifiers (i.e., “mild,” “moderate,” or “severe”) to stage the disease when these modifiers are documented, says Jennifer Avery, CCS, CPC-H, CPC, CPC-I, senior regulatory specialist at HCPro, Inc., in Marblehead, MA.
-
Pay close attention to transplant patients. The presence of CKD alone in a patient who has undergone a kidney transplant is not a transplant complication, says Avery. When the physician does not document a complication, assign a code for the stage of CKD and code V42.0 (transplant status). When a complication such as failure or rejection is documented, report 996.81 (complications of transplanted kidney). Query the physician when documentation is unclear.
-
Don’t make assumptions. Unless the physician documents a link between CKD and another condition, coders may not assume a cause-and-effect relationship exists, says Robert S. Gold, MD, founder and CEO of DCBA, Inc., in Atlanta. This comes into play with CKD as it relates to anemia (285.21), hyperparathyroidism (588.81), diabetes (code category 250.xx), and secondary diabetes (code category 249.xx). The only exception concerns hypertension and CKD. ICD-9-CM presumes a cause-and-effect relationship between the two and classifies the diagnosis as hypertensive CKD (code category 403) or hypertensive heart disease (code category 404).
Editor’s note: Learn additional tips and information on renal failure coding through HCPro’s audio conference, “Renal Failure Coding and Querying: Under the Clinical Perspective.”
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
