Editor's note: Correction
HIM Connection, December 29, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Editor’s note: We regret the error in last week’s Q&A on coding anemia due to antineoplastic chemotherapy, which should have read as follows:
Q: Can you explain the new ICD-9 guidelines for coding anemia due to antineoplastic chemotherapy and provide an example?
A: Anemia due to antineoplastic chemotherapy and antineoplastic chemotherapy-induced anemia are synonymous. Report them both with 285.3. Report 285.22 for anemia secondary to a malignancy, a form of chronic anemia. When both conditions occur in the same patient—and a physician properly documents both—report codes 285.3 and 285.22. For example, a patient is maintained on cisplatinum for non–small cell carcinoma of the lung. The physician documents that before the chemotherapy begins, the patient has anemia secondary to the lung cancer (285.22). If upon initiation of the chemotherapy and cisplatinum, the patient’s anemia progresses, and the physician then documents the condition as anemia due to the chemotherapy (285.3), then in this scenario, report 285.22 and 285.3.
Editor’s note: William E. Haik, MD, director of DRG Review, Inc., in Fort Walton Beach, FL, answered this question in the December issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
