Tool: Send physician documentation kudos straight to the top
CDI Strategies, November 26, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
At St. Mary’s Hospital in Passaic, NJ, Melanie Halpern, RN-BC, MBA, CCDS, clinical documentation specialist, helped develop a “good documentation” letter to congratulate physicians on their documentation efforts, complete with an “A+” graphic in the upper right-hand corner (visit ACDIS Forms & Tools Library to download the document.)
“We chuckled at the “A+” but it's turning out to have a beneficial effect,” says Halpern, who adds that physician documentation in the medical record should meet the basic elements of good clinical documentation as outlined in AHIMA practice brief “Managing an Effective Query Process,” issued on October, 2008. These include the following elements:
- legibility
- completeness
- clarity
- consistency
- precision
After the CDI specialist leaves the ‘good documentation’ letter for the physician, they e-mail the vice president of medical affairs (without disclosing patient identifiers) and describe what in the chart was exemplary, Halpern says. Here are two examples of e-mails sent to administrators:
1. "FYI, I bestowed the ‘good clinical documentation’ letter to Dr. XXX, acknowledging his efforts (and the multidisciplinary consultants on the case) in the written documentation noted on a complicated, non-compliant patient with multi-system problems, admitted for aggressive treatment of a gangrenous below knee amputation. Surgery, renal, and ID have been providing excellent collaboration on the case."
2. "I wanted you to know I placed my first ‘good documentation’ letter on the chart of Dr. YYY. The patient’s admitting diagnosis was pneumonia (94-year-old female on hospital unit X), and with excellent evaluation and management of clinical indicators and consultations, the severity of illness and co-morbidities were further described to include sepsis/metabolic encephalopathy and aspiration pneumonia."
“We thought it was important to recognize the consultants (and other providers) in the e-mail to administration because we want to endorse their documentation efforts. Despite my worry that it may set us up for legal problems, our administration felt the CDI staff
commented on the quality of documentation, not the quality of direct patient care. So, we currently incorporate this practice and probably post one or two letters per month,” Halpern says.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
