Protecting PHI stored in Microsoft applications
HIM Connection, November 17, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Q. How should we manage the tracking/logging of PHI that may be stored in standard Microsoft products, such as Outlook® calendars or SharePoint® lists? Our electronic medical record application has built-in PHI audit trails/log reports.
Increasingly, our end users create appointments and lists in standard Microsoft applications. If these lists contain PHI, does a method of tracking these data to assist in monitoring breaches exist? Am I overreacting or should I be concerned about PHI and HIPAA security requirements in such applications?
A. You need to be concerned about protecting PHI wherever it exists in your organization.
The level of PHI that Outlook calendars may include is probably minimal. Employees who meet to discuss something pertaining to a particular patient probably include the patient’s name in the meeting request, but they probably don’t include any additional information.
Other applications, such as Word® or Excel®, may contain greater amounts of PHI, depending on the individual user’s responsibilities.
Tracking or logging PHI in these applications would be very difficult, so limiting access to computers or other devices on which this information is stored is the best approach.
All devices containing PHI should be password- protected at a minimum. Encourage PC users to store their files on network drives rather than their local hard drives to protect data and ensure periodic backup.
Editor’s note: Mary Brandt, president of Brandt & Associates, Inc., a healthcare consulting firm in Bellaire, TX answered this question in the November issue of Briefings on HIPAA.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
