Ask these questions in your harm threshold risk assessment
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, October 26, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
HHS’ interim final rule on breach notification includes a “harm threshold” provision that provides covered entities (CEs) an avenue to avoid reporting a breach to HHS. If the incident involves encrypted data compliant with HHS guidelines or if a risk assessment shows that the disclosure does not pose a significant risk to the affected individual, there is no breach.
But CEs and business associates (BAs) must follow systematic steps to reach that “no harm, no foul” conclusion. They must document their findings and have them readily available if an auditor requests them. Facilities should always conduct an informal or formal risk assessment regardless of whether the disclosure appears innocent.
John C. Parmigiani, MS, BES, president of John C. Parmigiani & Associates, LLC, in Ellicott City, MD, says your risk assessment should answer the following questions:
- Who was involved? How many patients’ information was breached?
- Did the perpetrator copy the information, transfer it, change it, or simply look at it?
- When did it happen? (This is important because the 60-day breach reporting window to HHS starts when you first learn of it.)
- Is there a financial risk to the victim, a personal risk, or both?
- Was the motive for the breach nefarious or casual?
- Is the risk for further harm still there?
- What can the organization do right now to ensure no further damage occurs?
- What has the organization learned from the disclosure?
- How can the organization prevent this in the future?
Editor’s note: This is an excerpt from the November issue of Briefings on HIPAA, the 12-page HCPro, Inc. newsletter.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched
