Tip: Appropriately report units in excess of MUE
APCs Insider, October 16, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
In FAQ 8736, CMS instructs hospitals how to report units in excess of the medically unlikely edits (MUE) limits. Hospitals should place the same code on separate claim lines, with an appropriate modifier, so the number of units on each line is within the MUE limit.
Hospitals can use the following modifiers, according to the FAQ:
-
-76 (repeat procedure by same physician)
-
-77 (repeat procedure by another physician)
-
Anatomic modifiers (e.g., -RT, -LT, -F1, -F2)
-
-91 (repeat clinical diagnostic laboratory test)
-
-59 (distinct procedural service) only if no other modifier describes the service
In prior guidance (FAQ 8735), CMS said that contractors should apply MUE limits against each line of a claim, rather than the entire claim. Therefore, if a hospital reports a HCPCS or CPT code on more than one line of a claim by using modifiers, the contractors should separately adjudicate each line with that code against the MUE, according to CMS.
This tip was adapted from the article “Two years later, MUEs are still a puzzle” in the October issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Jury sides with blood lab technician in New Jersey whistleblower case
- Note from Hugh
- Q/A: Should we use modifier -Q0 to override edits for ICDs?
- Questions surround when time starts for proposed inpatient presumption
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- QAPI is coming: Is your facility preparing for its arrival?
- Tip: Review codes that are now packaged
- CMS releases updated MDS 3.0 RAI User's Manual
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- E-mailed
-
- Questions surround when time starts for proposed inpatient presumption
- Jury sides with blood lab technician in New Jersey whistleblower case
- Q/A: Should we use modifier -Q0 to override edits for ICDs?
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Tip: Review codes that are now packaged
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- QAPI is coming: Is your facility preparing for its arrival?
- CMS recommends use of AHRQ Common Formats for hospital adverse event reporting
- ACDIS/AHIMA brief provides guidance on query best practices
- Searched
