Briefings on APCs, November 2009
Briefings on APCs, November 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on APCs.
This issue features the second part of our series on physician supervision requirements for diagnostic tests. We unravel the confusion surrounding coding and billing for supplies, define the terminology associated with supplies, and help you decide whether you need a DME license. We explain the updates to the I/OCE edits and answer questions about the proper use of modifier -59.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on APCs.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Hospice group to pay U.S. $1.83 million in False Claims Act suit
- Q/A: Billing for DME
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina
- Searched
