Accurately assign POA indicators with the right info
HIM Connection, September 29, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
The present-on-admission (POA) indicator refers to conditions that are present at the time an order for inpatient admission occurs. Coders should report a POA indicator for a principal diagnosis, as well as any secondary diagnoses or E codes.
To assign POA, coders must rely on a treating physician’s documentation. Assuming physician documentation is accurate and complete, a coder can consider these tips when assigning a POA indicator:
- Look in the history and physical, as well as the ER physician documentation and admitting progress notes and orders. The cut-off point in determining whether the condition was POA is when the admit order was written.
- Look for confirming diagnoses. Perhaps the physician documented a sign or symptom on admission, but didn’t render a diagnosis until two or three days later. The physician may have documented a diagnosis as “possible” or “probable,” but didn’t confirm it until later in the progress notes. Only code a diagnosis listed as “possible” or “probable” when the condition is later confirmed or still qualified as uncertain at the time of discharge. Since the diagnosis is based on signs or symptoms that were POA, the coder would assign a “yes” indicator. Note that an uncertain diagnosis would be POA only when that diagnosis had related signs or symptoms that were present at the time of admission. Otherwise, if the signs and symptoms developed after the physician order, the diagnosis is not POA.
This tip was adapted from the HCPro book, The MS-DRG Training Handbook. For ordering information, visit the HCMarketplace.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Code changes should help ease the pain when coding for facet joint injections
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Searched
