TIP: Couch your query when clarifying unstable angina
CDI Strategies, September 3, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Editor’s Note: The following tip was excerpted from the article “Tips for problematic CCs, A-Z” in the upcoming edition of CDI Journal.
Angina, unstable (411.1): Despite some misconceptions to the contrary, a coder may report unstable angina if a physician documents any of the following diagnoses (i.e., a query is not required):
- Progressive angina
- Accelerated angina
- Initial (new onset) angina
Since angina unspecified is not a CC, some CDI specialists query physicians using terms such as ‘unstable’ or ‘pre-infarction’ angina. However, physicians may balk at these queries and state that the patient does not qualify for these more severe types of angina. William E. Haik, MD, director, DRG Review, Inc., Fort Walton Beach, FL, recommends a different line of questioning: “A softer term, such as progressive, accelerated, or new onset (initial) angina, may be more appropriate, and all group under 411.1,” he says.
CDI specialists should suspect (and therefore query for) progressive/accelerated angina in patients with a known history of chronic angina whose chronic angina becomes accelerated (i.e., it occurs from less activity than is typical, Haik says.). In contrast, unstable angina requires aggressive physician intervention, such as treatments of IV nitroglycerine/morphine.
Note that when a physician documents acute coronary syndrome (ACS), he or she may not mean that the patient has angina, even though ACS, according to coding guidelines, groups to 411.1. “ACS is a spectrum of disease relating to ischemic heart disease—it could be a patient with unstable angina, or it could be a patient with an acute myocardial infarction,” notes Haik. If a patient is admitted with acute chest pain, and has elevated biomarkers (such as elevated CPK or troponin levels), query the physician to further specify the ACS as a subendocardial or transmural myocardial infarction.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Develop effective strategies for your breach notification response program
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Searched
