TIP: Couch your query when clarifying unstable angina
CDI Strategies, September 3, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Editor’s Note: The following tip was excerpted from the article “Tips for problematic CCs, A-Z” in the upcoming edition of CDI Journal.
Angina, unstable (411.1): Despite some misconceptions to the contrary, a coder may report unstable angina if a physician documents any of the following diagnoses (i.e., a query is not required):
- Progressive angina
- Accelerated angina
- Initial (new onset) angina
Since angina unspecified is not a CC, some CDI specialists query physicians using terms such as ‘unstable’ or ‘pre-infarction’ angina. However, physicians may balk at these queries and state that the patient does not qualify for these more severe types of angina. William E. Haik, MD, director, DRG Review, Inc., Fort Walton Beach, FL, recommends a different line of questioning: “A softer term, such as progressive, accelerated, or new onset (initial) angina, may be more appropriate, and all group under 411.1,” he says.
CDI specialists should suspect (and therefore query for) progressive/accelerated angina in patients with a known history of chronic angina whose chronic angina becomes accelerated (i.e., it occurs from less activity than is typical, Haik says.). In contrast, unstable angina requires aggressive physician intervention, such as treatments of IV nitroglycerine/morphine.
Note that when a physician documents acute coronary syndrome (ACS), he or she may not mean that the patient has angina, even though ACS, according to coding guidelines, groups to 411.1. “ACS is a spectrum of disease relating to ischemic heart disease—it could be a patient with unstable angina, or it could be a patient with an acute myocardial infarction,” notes Haik. If a patient is admitted with acute chest pain, and has elevated biomarkers (such as elevated CPK or troponin levels), query the physician to further specify the ACS as a subendocardial or transmural myocardial infarction.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
