Coding incidental versus ectopic pregnancy
HIM-HIPAA Insider, September 8, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM-HIPAA Insider!
Q: What does an incidental pregnancy (code V22.2) mean? Is it related at all to an ectopic pregnancy (code 633.11)? Should I report the two together?
A: Coding Clinic, fourth quarter 1996, p. 50–51, states that code V22.2 is a secondary code only for use when the pregnancy is in no way complicating the reason for the visit. Otherwise, coders should report a code from the obstetric chapter.
For routine outpatient prenatal visits when no complications are present, report codes V22.0 (supervision of normal first pregnancy) and V22.1 (supervision of other normal pregnancy) as the first-listed diagnoses. Do not report these codes in conjunction with Chapter 11 codes. For more information, see Chapter 11 (Pregnancy/Childbirth) of the ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting that took effect October 1, 2008.
Editor’s note: Alison Stangeby, RHIA, CCS, CPC, senior consultant at BKD, LLP in Little Rock, AR, answered this question that originally appeared in the August 2009 issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM-HIPAA Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Joint Commission Urges Hospitals to Protect Workers from Abuse
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Don’t forget the three checks in medication administration
- CMS and Joint Commission clarify door-closing devices standards
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Maryland health system locked out of network by ransomware
- Avoid Eyewash-Related Regulatory Compliance Issues
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- E-mailed
-
- Joint Commission now allows partially-used oxygen canisters in 'full' rack
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Injections and infusions continue to confuse coders
- CMS and Joint Commission clarify door-closing devices standards
- Joint Commission Urges Hospitals to Protect Workers from Abuse
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- Report codes 43235, 91035 for gastrointestinal endoscopy
- The Hospital Guide to Contemporary Utilization Review
- Joint Commission and CMS Alignment: Restraint Management
- Is core privileging accepted by CMS and The Joint Commission? Yes.
- Searched