Q&A: Active duty members on the move
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, July 20, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Q. The Department of Defense allows some active duty members moving to a new base to hand-carry their own original medical record to the next base. Is this a HIPAA violation? This seems to represent a privacy and security concern by risking the loss or theft of the original medical record.
A. It is not a HIPAA violation to allow any patient to transport his or her own original medical record from one location to another.
However, this represents what could be a significant risk. Even allowing the individual to carry a copy of his or her medical record (versus the original) from one location to another represents a privacy risk.
Although HIPAA does not prohibit an individual from carrying his or her own medical record from one location to another, a covered entity should discontinue such practices to better protect the privacy and security of the record. Covered entities are allowed to adopt more stringent privacy and security practices than required by HIPAA. Such practices would be appropriate in this case.
Editor's note: Chris Apgar, president of Portland, OR-based Apgar & Associates, LLC, answered this question. This is not legal advice. Consult your attorney regarding legal matters.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
