Q/A: Use of modifier -25
APCs Weekly Monitor, July 17, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
A: The definition of modifier -25—Significant, Separately Identifiable Evaluation and Management Service…on the Same Day of a Procedure or Other Service—has not changed. The OPPS final rule for 2009 included no changes pertaining to use of this modifier. The CMS transmittal for the OCE update states:
Under some circumstances, medical visits on the same date as a procedure will result in additional payments. A modifier of 25 with an Evaluation and Management (E&M) code, status indicator V, is used to report a medical visit that takes place on the same date that a procedure with status indicator S or T is performed, but that is significant and separately identifiable from the procedure. However, if any E&M code that occurs on a day with a type “T” or “S” procedure does not have a modifier of 25, then edit 21 will apply and the claim will be returned to provider.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
-
2011 ICD-9-CM Manual Volumes 1 and 2
HCPro is pleased to introduce the 2011 ICD-9-CM Manual Volumes 1 & 2 for professional and non-acute care settings. Reserve...
-
Modifier -59 Case Studies: Clarify Common Coding Confusion
Modifier -59 is a perennial problem area for outpatient coders. It shouldn’t be viewed as a way to guarantee payment but...
-
Outpatient Bed Charge Capture: Billing for Common and Complex Cases
During this 90-minute audio conference, our expert speakers walk you through common and complex cases and explain compliant...
-
Billing No-Cost and Low-Cost Devices: Tips to Avoid the Audit Fast Track
During this 90-minute audio conference, our speakers will use a case study to demonstrate best practices to help you comply...
-
Facility E/M Coding: Tune up your criteria
During this live two hour audioconference, speakers will explain how to tune-up facility assessment criteria and ensure...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched