Meaningful use first draft could guide final definition
HIM Connection, June 23, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
The Health Information Technology Policy Committee stressed on Tuesday that the meaningful use definitions recommended by a study committee this week are merely a nonbinding "first step" in a complex winnowing process. The final product could change a great deal when CMS issues a proposed rule change for a 60-day public comment period at the end of 2009.
However, David Blumenthal, MD, HHS’ national coordinator for health information technology, did not dismiss the idea that components in Tuesday’s first draft definition of meaningful use would remain in the final rules, which will be phased in from 2011 to 2015.
"It’s going to be up to your readers to decide what they can read into the discussions that occurred today and what they can't," Blumenthal told HealthLeaders Media after Tuesday’s three-hour meeting. "I suspect that as this discussion proceeds, certain themes will recur. I’ve certainly said publicly that we are very intent on using the meaningful use authority and the high-tech legislation to lay the ground work for improved health system performance."
To read this full article, visit www.healthleadersmedia.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
-
PPS Alert for Long-Term Care
Looking for a tool to make your job easier? PPS Alert for Long-Term Care, exclusively for the RN or MDS coordinator, is your...
-
Briefings on APCs
Worried about the complexities of the new rules under OPPS and APCs? Briefings on APCs helps you understand the new rules...
-
Medical Records Briefing
Guiding Health Information Management professionals through the continuously changing field of medical records and toward a...
-
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies
Submitting improper Medicare documentaion can lead to denial of fees, payback, fines, and increased diligence from payers...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- The Joint Commission extends its accreditation to advanced diagnostic imaging
- FDA extends time to replace Steris sterilizing system
- CMS clarifies physician signatures needed on all lab orders
- Greeley Reflections
- Use PEPPER reports to stay on top of common coding errors
- Q/A: Select correct revenue code for packaged drugs
- Q&A: EHR audit log retention
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- See one, do one, teach one: Do you have a peer review training program?
- E-mailed
-
- FDA extends time to replace Steris sterilizing system
- Q&A: Impact of SOI/ROM on DRG assignment
- The Joint Commission extends its accreditation to advanced diagnostic imaging
- CMS clarifies physician signatures needed on all lab orders
- Q/A: Select correct revenue code for packaged drugs
- Credentialing and privileging monthly: ABP may point maintenance of certification in a new direction
- Meaningful use calls for meaningful risk analysis
- Use PEPPER reports to stay on top of common coding errors
- Watch for corridor clutter under top-cited LS.02.01.20
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched