Meaningful use first draft could guide final definition
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, June 22, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
The Health Information Technology Policy Committee has emphasized that the “meaningful use’ definitions recommended by a study committee last week are merely a non-binding "first step" in a complex winnowing process.
The end result could be quite different when CMS issues a proposed rule change for a 60-day public comment period at the end of 2009.
David Blumenthal, MD, HHS' national coordinator for health information technology, did not dismiss the possibility that components of the first draft definition of meaningful use would remain in the final rule to be phased in from 2011 to 2015.
"It's going to be up to your readers to decide what they can read into the discussions that occurred today and what they can't," Blumenthal told HealthLeaders Media after the study committee’s three-hour meeting Tuesday. "I suspect that as this discussion proceeds, certain themes will recur,” he said. “I've certainly said publicly that we are very intent on using the meaningful use authority and the high-tech legislation to lay the ground work for improved health system performance."
Read the full article by John Commins of HealthLeaders Media.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
