BA agreements: Consider additions to new contracts
HIM Connection, June 2, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 hit business associates (BA) hard because they now must abide by the HIPAA security rule. However, the compliance date for changes associated with the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act is not until February 10, 2010. Covered entities shouldn’t panic either, experts say. During the next eight months, health industry experts expect HHS to issue guidance that will clarify provisions pertaining to BAs, including their new role as HIPAA security rule–covered entities. Further, covered entities can expect to better understand how HITECH will require them to draft BA agreements in the future.
Editor’s note: For more information about BA agreements or to purchase a copy of this article for $10, visit the HCPro Web site. Subscribers to Health Information Compliance Insider can access this article in the June issue of the newsletter.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
-
Guide to HIPAA Auditing, Second Edition
This new edition of a best-selling book delivers the hands-on tools and guidance you need to conduct effective in-house...
-
The No-Hassle Guide to HIPAA Policies: A Privacy and Security Toolkit
HIPAA regulations require extensive documentation—likely more than you've done in the past. Changing the way you look...
-
The HIPAA and HITECH Toolkit
The HIPAA and HITECH Toolkit is a valuable resource that helps both CEs and BAs understand and meet the HITECH Act's...
-
HIPAA Handbook for Coders, Billers and HIM Staff
Train all of your staff members with this handbook and others in the 2009 HIPAA Handbook Series. Ensure they understand...
-
ICD-10 Trainer
ICD-10 Trainer is a bi-weekly e-newsletter with the latest tips from the experts about how to get ready for the new coding...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched