Q&A: Querying for type of heart failure
CDI Strategies, May 28, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Q:Last year a cardiologist provided an educational session for our coding auditor and the clinical documentation specialists. In this session he defined heart failure as:
“. . . a complex clinical syndrome that can result from any structural or functional cardiac disorder that impairs the ability of the ventricle to fill with or eject blood.”
After that education and other articles I have read, I've always thought if a patient has heart failure, it has to be either diastolic or systolic.
Lately though, I've had charts that are telling me the echo showed "no diastolic HF, acute on chronic heart failure due to mitral regurg and afib," or "chronic decompensated HF due to afib and aortic stenosis."
In cases such as these, when the physician is stating there is no diastolic or systolic dysfunction but there is heart failure, is it more appropriate to ask if this is acute pulmonary edema? Or should we just leave the documentation as-is and code the afib and/or valvular disease?
A: What you are experiencing is the difference between chronic heart failure and its modeling, chronic ventricular dysfunction with its acute exacerbations, and acute heart failure—which can be a very different animal.
In this instance, the cardiologist is sort of right, but slightly wrong, too. When a patient has acute heart failure (or CHF) due to atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, the patient has acute diastolic heart left ventricular failure. It would be appropriate to make a request for clarification regarding the relationship between the documented tachyarrhythmia, the documented acute congestive heart failure, and the acute diastolic dysfunction that accompanies tachycardias.
Editor’s Note: Robert S. Gold, MD, provided this week’s answer. He is the founder of DCBA, Inc., a consulting firm in Atlanta that provides physician-to-physician programs in clinical documentation improvement. Contact him at DCBAInc@cs.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
