Rhode Island to track statewide healthcare IT use
HIM Connection, April 28, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Nearly 40% of Rhode Island physicians report using electronic clinical information systems to help provide care for their patients, according to the results of the state's 2009 Physician Health Information Technology Survey released April 6.
The report includes information related to five measures:
- Measure 1—Electronic medical records (EMR): Doctors with computer systems or EMRs that track patients’ healthcare (Yes or No)
-
Measure 2—‘Qualified’ EMRs: Doctors with ‘qualified’ EMRs, or computer systems that can perform certain tasks (Yes or No)
-
Measure 3—Basic functionality use: How often doctors who have EMRs use their EMRs to perform certain basic tasks (scored from 0–100)
-
Measure 4—Advanced functionality use: How often doctors who have EMRs use their EMRs to perform certain advanced tasks (scored from 0–100)
-
Measure 5—e-Prescribing: Physicians who send their patients’ prescriptions electronically, or "e-prescribe" (Yes or No)
"One of the State’s healthcare priorities is to use HIT to increase the efficient delivery of patient care," Rhode Island Department of Health Public Reporting Program Director Samara Viner-Brown said in the press release. "These data help us to see how many physicians are actually using HIT. Patients can see if their physician uses electronic medical records or can find a physician who uses electronic medical records."
The survey reflects a three-year collaboration to encourage physician reporting in Rhode Island. In 1998, a legislative mandate required the department of health to publicly report healthcare quality for licensed providers. In 2006, the law was expanded to include reports from individual physicians.
To view the press release, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched