HITECH UPDATE: HHS misses deadline for definition of unsecured PHI
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, April 20, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Congress gave the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) 60 days from the February 17 signing of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act— or Friday, April 17— to define “unsecured protected health information.”
And HHS apparently has missed that deadline.
HHS had not provided a definition as of press time Friday. So by default, the definition includes all protected health information that is not secured by an encryption standard endorsed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). For the record, the general default definition of unsecured PHI in the Health Information Technology Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act is:
- “Protected health information that is not secured by a technology standard that renders protected health information unusable, unreadable, or indecipherable to unauthorized individuals and is developed or endorsed by a standards developing organization that is accredited by the American National Standards Institute.”
When can HHS change the default definition? That’s unclear now.
“As long as you're buying products that use known algorithms, you really should be fine,” says Kate Borten, CISSP, CISM, president of The Marblehead Group in Marblehead, MA. “… I don’t think HHS or Congress expect organizations to throw out what they’ve done so far."
Read an analysis on unsecured PHI on www.healthleadersmedia.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
