Comment on security breach notification rule that targets personal health records
HIM Connection, April 21, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
If you’ve got an opinion on the proposed rule to require vendors of a personal health record (PHR) and related entities to provide notice to consumers in the event of a HIPAA security breach, be sure to voice it. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is seeking public comment on the 50-page proposed rule by June 1.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 requires the FTC and HHS to draft a report on potential privacy, security, and breach notification requirements for PHR vendors and related entities no later than February 2010. The FTC will publish an interim final regulation no later August 17, which is 180 days after February 17—the day on which President Obama signed ARRA into effect.
According to ARRA, related entities are those that:
- Offer products or services through the Web site of a vendor of PHRs
- Are not covered entities (as defined by HIPAA) and that offer products or services through the Web sites of covered entities that offer individuals PHRs
- Are not covered entities and that access information in a PHR or send information to a PHR
Although many states already require a breach notification of electronic personal health information, ARRA also requires a federal breach requirement in which PHR vendors and related entities must notify the FTC and each individual citizen whose information was breached.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
