QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
APCs Weekly Monitor, April 17, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Q. A patient is to get IV antibiotics twice a day. Here is how I would bill this:
- 7 a.m.: 96365 (Initial intravenous infusion, up to one hour), quantity 1; 96366 (each additional hour) for any additional time during that episode.
- 7 p.m.: 96365, quantity 1; 96366 for any additional time during that episode
And so on; with, of course, the charge for the drug.
Other facilities are telling us that if a hep lock was placed during that 7 a.m. encounter, then you would not bill another initial for that day and that only one initial can be billed per day.
My argument is that when the CPT Manual states only one initial per day, they mean that you cannot bill an initial infusion and an initial hydration on the same day, and that the initial charge is based on the sequence of the infusion. But if the person comes in twice in one day, you take vitals both times and do the paperwork both times. This seems to make initial the valid choice for that second daily visit.
A. The answer depends on the actual scenario. In your specific example, it appears that the patient comes in at 7 a.m., receives his/her treatment and is discharged to return at 7 p.m. for a separate encounter. In this scenario, you will report an initial service each encounter, and append modifier -59 to the codes for the second encounter.
However, if the patient comes to the hospital for an outpatient service or observation services, the reporting is different. See the following, from the December 2007 CPT Assistant:
If patient is coming in for the listed scenario and crossing calendar days - i.e. OBSV [observation] services, same antibiotic given multiple times in same OBSV episode:
7:00 am 96365 x 1 with subsequent hour(s) [96366]
7:00 pm same calendar day - 96367 (sequential infusion; does not state SAME or DIFF drug) with [96366] subsequent hours
7:00 am next calendar day and patient continues to be observation- [96366] reported with hours
7:00 pm [96366] and so on. Report 96367 only once per sequential infusion of same infusate mix
In addition, see the note under CPT code 96367 in the 2009 CPT Manual:
Report 96367 in conjunction with 96365, 96374, 96409, 96413 if provided as a secondary or subsequent service after a different initial service is administered through the same IV access.
In the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, chapter 4, section 230.2, CMS notes the following:
Drug administration services are to be reported with a line item date of service on the day they are provided. In addition, only one initial drug administration service is to be reported per vascular access site per encounter, including during an encounter where observation services span more one calendar day.
How you report your scenario depends on the documentation in the record and whether the patient presented for two separate encounters or a single, extended encounter.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- E-mailed
-
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Hospice group to pay U.S. $1.83 million in False Claims Act suit
- Q/A: Billing for DME
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina
- Searched
