Tip: Elevate coders' role in concurrent reviews
APCs Weekly Monitor, April 17, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Everyone knows that an immense amount of teamwork is necessary for a CDI program to truly be successful. Physicians and facility administration need to be supportive, of course, but the primary CDI stakeholders-i.e., nurses, CDI specialists, and coders-need to work together.
Many CDI programs use nurses as their primary concurrent reviewers, the argument being that nurses speak "clinical-ese," i.e., the physician language. However, without the specific knowledge of coding guidelines, such clinical knowledge may muddy the already murky waters of documentation.
Read more in CDI Strategies. Association of Clinical Documentation Specialists (ACDIS) members can read more related articles in the quarterly CDI Journal. To become a member, call 800/650-6787 or email our customer service department.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
-
Coding and Billing for Outpatient Rehab Made Easy:
Take the confusion out of coding and billing for outpatient rehab and ensure you receive accurate reimbursement for the...
-
2011 ICD-9 CM Volumes 1, 2 and 3
HCPro is pleased to introduce the 2011 ICD-9-CM Manual Volumes 1, 2&3 for hospital coding. Reserve your copy now and HCPro...
-
2010 RAC Track: Medicare Compliance Forum Audio Recording
On-demand audio recordings of the RAC track of HCPro Revenue Cycle Institute's popular Medicare Compliance Forum, held May...
-
Principal Diagnosis for Complex Cases
During this 90-minute audio conference you’ll learn how to support your choice of principal diagnosis by reviewing difficult...
-
Coding and You
Coding and You is written specifically to help non-coders; medical assistants, lab technicians, compliance professionals...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched