Q&A: Text messaging
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, April 6, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Q. We have quite a few doctors dumping their answering service and going to a text messaging environment. Most use the same mobile service provider and want us to send text messages including patient PHI when we need to contact them. The mobile vendor’s text site is encrypted, but it is unclear whether the transmission to the pager is. Is this a violation of the HIPAA rules?
A. It is likely a violation of the HIPAA security rule’s implementation specification regarding encryption of PHI transmissions. Even though the rule identifies encryption as an addressable implementation specification, a covered entity would be hard pressed to justify transmitting PHI unencrypted, given the improvements in encryption technology and the significant reduction in cost since the rule’s finalization five years ago.
Even if the mobile carrier offers secure text messaging within its network, if the text message is sent through another carrier, sent unencrypted to pagers, or is sent using the mobile carrier’s roaming services (in essence, cell towers that are owned by another carrier), there is a risk the text message can be intercepted.
There are at least a few solutions on the market that would support secure communication to and between mobile devices, but the solutions require the installation of the encryption on all mobile devices that will send and receive PHI.
These solutions will not provide protections for PHI transmitted to pagers—only mobile phones.
Editor's note: Chris Apgar, president of Portland, OR-based Apgar & Associates, LLC, answered this question. This is not legal advice. Consult your attorney regarding legal matters.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
