Use kidney key-words to sooth your documentation troubles
CDI Strategies, April 2, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Many physicians fail to document conditions associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). These two conditions represent some of the strongest predictors of morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization in severity and risk-adjustment methodologies, and are integral to pay-for-performance indicators, says James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, director at FTI Healthcare Inc., in Brentwood, TN.
“Instead, we use nonspecific (and lower-weighted) terms, such as azotemia or renal insufficiency. Sometimes, we don’t document anything at all,” Kennedy says.
However, even a mild serum creatinine rise (0.5 mg/dl) consistent with AKI is associated with a three-and-a-half day increase in inpatient length of stay and nearly $7,500 in excess hospital costs, according to a 2005 report from the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF).
Medicare weights its MS-DRGs based on the certain stages of kidney impairment. For example, documented chronic renal insufficiency adds no weight to an MS-DRG whereas Stage 4 and 5 CKD are designated as higher-weighted co-morbidities or complications (CCs) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) qualifies as a major CC (MCC). Acute renal insufficiency or prerenal azotemia adds no weight, whereas AKI qualifies as an MCC.
Many physicians describe acute rises of creatinine as prerenal azotemia or acute renal insufficiency, even if the definition of AKI is met and resources described in the above UCSF article are used. Severity of illness is better defined with AKI term instead of azotemia or insufficiency, Kennedy notes..
But “of course, none of this matters unless [physicians] document these terminologies in the medical record, especially our discharge summaries, and work with our coding staff to defend these definitions when held accountable by outside auditors,” he says.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
