MRB benchmarking survey: HIM directors share scanning productivity standards
Medical Records Briefing, April 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Records Briefing.
Editor’s note: This article is the first in a two-part series on MRB’s scanning productivity benchmarking survey. Part one provides an overview of function-specific questions HIM directors should ask when calculating scanning productivity. Part two will provide tips on how to make the scanning process more efficient.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Records Briefing.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched