Watch for changing physician supervision requirements
APCs Weekly Monitor, March 20, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
After a year of successive and often confusing clarifications regarding facility billing for outpatient services incident to a physician's service, CMS is delivering a message few facilities want to hear: The idea of presumed supervision within a hospital, which the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual discussed for years, appears to be no longer valid.
You can read the complete article on the HCPro, Inc. Web site. Briefings on APCs subscribers have free access to this article in the April issue via their online subscriptions.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched