Know how the economic stimulus plan can help offset your EHR implementation costs
HIM Connection, February 24, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Title XIII of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 focuses on healthcare information technology (IT) and quality, with $19 billion in grants and loans set aside for infrastructure and incentive payments under Medicare and Medicaid for providers who adopt certified EHR technology. The grants and loans include $17 billion slated for incentives, with $2 billion allotted to jump-start health IT adoption.
The Act outlines incentive plans for eligible professionals for their ‘meaningful use’ of EHRs. The Act specifies that ‘meaningful use’ requires the following:
- Use of certified EHR technology
- Information exchange
- Reporting on yet-to-be-selected clinical quality measures using EHRs
Incentive payments begin in 2011, and they encourage early adoption. For example, when a hospital implements an EHR in 2011, it will receive 100% of the incentive amount for which the hospital is eligible. However, when the hospital delays implementation until 2012, it will only receive 75%. After 2015, there will be no incentive payment.
Nonhospital-based physicians will receive incentive payments based on a similar—though not exactly the same—payment structure; however, they will also receive payment reductions for failing to adopt by 2015.
Critical access hospitals are eligible for incentive payments; however, they will be subject to a different calculation that is not currently available.
See Title IV on p. 360 of the PDF for more information regarding payment incentives.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched