RACs are back on track with revised expansion schedule
APCs Weekly Monitor, February 13, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
CMS announced February 6 the permanent RAC program is once again underway as the RAC bid protests filed by Viant, Inc., and PRG Schultz, USA, Inc., have been withdrawn. Viant and PRG’s protests were resolved February 4, so CMS announced it is lifting the stop work order.
"If you have put your RAC preparation on hold, it's time to start finalizing your strategy. And it's time to become familiar with the contractor in your area," says Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, the director of Medicare and compliance for HCPro, Inc.
CMS has revised its RAC expansion schedule, according to the new "RAC Phase In Map" posted February 10 to the CMS Web site. The first phase is set to begin March 1, 2009. The second stage will begin August 1, according to the map.
The previous expansion schedule was set to occur in three stages. However, the now-resolved protests by delayed the initial onset of the permanent RAC program.
“For those hospitals who have a couple of weeks to prepare, I believe one of the biggest challenges is to have well established coordination of denials and appeals and an effective tracking tool,” says Yvonne Focke, RN, BSN, MBA, revenue cycle director at St. Elizabeth and St. Luke Hospitals in Covington, KY. “For those of us who have until August, we’ll have to continue on course with our RAC preparedness, including assessing our gaps, quantifying our risk and establishing a tracking mechanism.”
Editor’s note: To view the decision information on the GAO Web site, visit the GAO Bid Protest Docket and enter file #400443. The CMS Web site has posted additional details on the decision and more general information on the Medicare RAC program.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
