Briefings on HIPAA March 2009
Briefings on HIPAA, March 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on HIPAA.
Inside:
California steps up efforts to protect PHI; other states may follow
Get administration, board members on board with compliance program
Q&A: Patient answering machines, e-mail communications, and more
DeviceLock protects against data theft
Privacy & Security Primer (pdf only)
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on HIPAA.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched