Understand similarities, differences between CMS CoPs and Joint Commission standards in 2009
HIM Connection, February 10, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Anyone involved in healthcare—from CEOs to frontline staff members—dread hearing, "We’re here to do an unannounced site visit of your facility." On any given day of the week, unexpected surveyors who say these words can cause anxiety, stress, and anguish in even the best run organizations.
Such surveys will determine whether your healthcare facility meets regulatory requirements, of which there are several sets. These sets of requirements have evolved over the past 20 years, and the main theme for 2009 is change…and lots of it. Both CMS and The Joint Commission (formerly JCAHO) have made significant changes to their requirements.
But the fact remains that all healthcare organizations will undergo some type of survey at some point in time. The key in 2009 is to understand and educate staff members about the changes, and at the same time, remain flexible to manage the changes and processes. Many similarities exist between CMS and The Joint Commission. Hopefully by understanding these similarities, ongoing survey preparation can be efficient and can help your organization achieve excellent results. After all, the goal of participants—the hospital, the regulatory agency, and the patient—is high-quality care and service that meets and exceeds standards and expectations.
Editor’s note: For more information on how The Joint Commission standards compare with the CMS Conditions of Participation, including a side-by-side comparison of the two, purchase a copy of HCPro’s book The CMS-Joint Commission Crosswalk, 2009 Edition.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Understand similarities, differences between CMS CoPs and Joint Commission standards in 2009 ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
