Can patients require our facility to send mail to alternative locations?
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, June 21, 2002
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Q: As a health care provider, is our facility required to honor requests by patients to send mail to alternative locations?
A: You must accept and accommodate reasonable requests by patients to receive communications of protected health information (PHI) by alternative means or at alternative locations.
The HHS commentary provides the example of a patient who does not want his or her family members to know about a certain treatment. The patient may request that the provider communicate about that treatment at his or her place of employment, by mail to a designated address, or by phone to a designated phone number. Similarly, a patient may request that the provider send communications in a closed envelope rather than a post card.
You may not require the patient to explain the reason for the request as a condition of abiding by it. A health plan can only require that a request contain a statement that disclosure of all or part of the information could endanger the individual.
Covered entities can condition the provision of a reasonable accommodation on:
- when appropriate, information as to how payment will be handled
- specification of an alternative address or other method of contact
- documentation of the request in writing
Covered entities can determine how reasonable the request is solely on the basis of the administrative difficulty of complying with it.
Brought to you by attorneys Marty Baxter and Gretchen McBeath at Bricker and Eckler, LLP (http://www.bricker.com/hipaa) and The Quality Management Consulting Group, Ltd. (http://www.qmcg.com). E-mail: mbaxter@bricker.com or gmcbeath@bricker.com
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched