Callers comment on HACs during special CMS session
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies, February 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
For more than a year, coders have reported the present-on-admission (POA) indicator for most diagnoses on hospital claims. Effective October 1, 2008, CMS stopped paying for certain hospital-acquired conditions (HAC) that are documented as secondary diagnoses and as not being POA (indicator N) or that include insufficient documentation (indicator U). Since then, CMS has reimbursed as though these secondary diagnoses were not clinically present.
The 2009 IPPS final rule listed the categories of HACs that CMS selected for implementation for fiscal year (FY) 2009. In addition, CMS proposed nine candidate HACs for future consideration. (See the sidebar below for a list.)
On December 18, 2008, CMS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) held a jointly sponsored daylong session to discuss the selected and candidate HACs, solicit participant comments, answer questions, and discuss the future of the payment provisions. More than 2,000 people, including participants on-site and dialing in via phone, attended the event.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Comments
0 comments on “Callers comment on HACs during special CMS session ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
