TIP: Keep an eye on legislation in new Congress
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, January 12, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
A new administration will soon take office in Washington, DC, and the change may have a significant effect on healthcare and HIPAA.
“The complaint has always been that HIPAA has teeth, but it doesn’t bite,” says John Parmigiani, MS, BES, president of John C. Parmigiani & Associates, LLC, in Ellicott City, MD, and chair of the team that created the HIPAA security rule.
Potential exists for “carrot and stick” incentives to urge providers to transition to electronic health records, says Susan A. Miller, Esq., chief operations officer and chief privacy officer at HealthTransactions.com. Pay-for-performance models that take payment away from providers who don’t move towards an electronic environment also are possible, says Miller.
Parmigiani also believes that federal legislation, which will expand the definition of covered entities to include business associates, is forthcoming.
For example, business associates (BA) working on behalf of covered entities are not required to abide by HIPAA privacy and security standards. The burden has always been on the covered entity to ensure the BA is keeping their information safe, says Parmigiani.
He also sees possible movement in the direction of a national pre-emptive privacy/data protection law that would embody the strongest aspects of data security espoused in the ever-increasing and more stringent state data protection laws.
Editor’s note: These tips were adapted from an article in the January issue of Health Information Compliance Insider. Learn more about the HCPro, Inc., newsletter.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “TIP: Keep an eye on legislation in new Congress ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
