Q&A: Querying for CHF using prior documentation
CDI Strategies, January 8, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Question: Part of our clinical support for determining the presence of congestive heart failure (CHF) includes referring to an echocardiogram performed during a previous admission. Using our electronic record, the physicians can access this same information to review it for mention of systolic or diastolic dysfunction in order to provide a link to exacerbation of CHF. Would using this prior documentation be considered "illegal" under the new American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) final physician query practice brief?
Answer: I do not believe it would be illegal for query the physician for clinical information that is present in the old record so long as there are clinical indications and/or documentation supporting that the condition qualifies as a principal or additional diagnosis. Specifically regarding CHF, it would not be wrong if a physician documents that a patient has CHF and a query discusses a previously performed echocardiogram. The question could be posed as follows:
Dear Dr. Jones,
Your progress note of XXXX date confirms that this patient has CHF. On XXXX date, the patient had an echocardiogram that was interpreted as having left ventricular dysfunction, impaired ventricular relaxation, and an estimated ejection of 45%. Please comment upon the nature and acuity of this patient’s CHF. Options may include:
| Nature | Acuity |
| Systolic | Chronic alone |
| Diastolic | Acute or acutely decompensated alone |
| Both systolic and diastolic | Acute on chronic |
| Other: | Other: |
| Cannot be determined | Cannot be determined |
Please also indicate the underlying cause of the patient’s CHF and any other condition that affected its stability during this hospitalization.
(James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, director for FTI Healthcare in Atlanta, GA answered this question.)
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Comments
0 comments on “Q&A: Querying for CHF using prior documentation ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
