News: CMS posts Value-Based Purchasing Issues Paper
CDI Strategies, December 4, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
On November 25, CMS posted an Issues Paper relating to its plan to transition to a Medicare Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) program for physician and other professional services. Download the paper here.
The paper is important for CDI specialists because it contains powerful proof that the payment incentives included in the VBP program will be tied to quality documentation.
“It will cost doctors money if they don’t practice and demonstrate efficiency in all facets of medicine, which includes ordering and providing the appropriate level of care, taking into account the health status of the patient,” says Glenn Krauss, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, C-CDIS, senior coding and chargemaster consultant with QHR in Brentwood, TN. "It is the physician’s responsibility to accurately and effectively report the health status of their patients through clinical documentation that supports and justifies consumption of health resources, regardless of diagnostic or therapeutic service ordered and provided."
For example, many tests physicians order don’t include a firm diagnosis, only a symptom, which will not satisfy the direction physician payment is headed under VBP—payment based on quality and efficiency, instead of the current model of quantity and volume of services.
“Our job is to help physicians substantiate their practice of medicine, which they don’t always think about,” Krauss says. “The (VBP) methodology hasn’t been established, but your best defense is for the physician to document what he or she is thinking.”
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Comments
0 comments on “News: CMS posts Value-Based Purchasing Issues Paper ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
