News: White paper considered boon for CDI programs
CDI Strategies, November 13, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
A recently released white paper by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement contains some sound strategies to ensure physician participation in a variety of hospital quality programs, including clinical documentation, says Glenn Krauss, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, C-CDIS, senior coding and chargemaster consultant with QHR in Brentwood, TN.
The white paper Engaging Physicians in a Shared Quality Agenda is free but requires registration. Go to www.ihi.org/ihi and register at the top of the page. Then, click the “Products” link on the left to download the white paper.
“We need to get away from thinking that clinical documentation is just about money—it’s about quality improvement,” Krauss says.
The white paper provides six structured frameworks for engaging physicians in hospital quality initiatives. These include:
- Discover common purpose
- Reframe values and beliefs
- Segment the engagement plan
- Use “engaging” improvement methods
- Show courage
- Adopt an engaging style
The white paper explores each of these six principles through examples. The paper also contains a physician engagement difficulty assessment (a questionnaire designed to give hospitals a sense of the barriers that may hinder partnerships with physicians), and an action plan.
“We see physicians as customers, but they’re really partners in reporting accurate core measures, risk of mortality, and medical necessity,” Krauss says. “This [white paper] describes the documentation specialists’ role in rolling out a program.”
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Comments
0 comments on “News: White paper considered boon for CDI programs ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
