CMS delays RAC permanent program
HIM Connection, November 11, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
CMS announced on November 3 that it has delayed the Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) permanent program and put a moratorium on all RAC-relayed informational sessions across the country. CMS has yet to release further details but told the American Hospital Association the action was necessary due to "a RAC protest and a stay of performance."
However, the California Hospital Association (CHA), in a memorandum obtained by HCPro., Inc, says that PRG Schultz (PRG), a contractor that submitted a bid for work in the permanent program but wasn’t selected as one of the four permanent contractors, was considering a challenge to the contract award process.
Despite the delay in the process, Joseph Zebrowitz, MD, executive vice president of Executive Health Resources in Newtown Square, PA, warns facilities not to change anything in terms of preparing for a RAC visit. The permanent program will not change, he says.
"Basically, this is infighting amongst CMS potential contractors who are upset that they were not awarded the RAC contract," Zebrowitz says. "I think it is important that this delay is not because of any question of whether the RACs are fair, or good, or legal. The RAC program is unchanged, and there is nothing out there to say that anything is going to be different. [CMS] just can not start when the contractors are in doubt. Once they resolve these complaints, they will start up."
Editor’s note: For more information, visit www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC. Stay up-to-date with RAC changes by signing up for HCPro’s free biweekly e-newsletter, The RAC Report. Visit www.hcmarketplace.com/prod-6895.html for more information.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “CMS delays RAC permanent program ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
