Examine postoperative condition coding
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies, November 1, 2008
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Just because a physician documents a condition during the postoperative period doesn’t mean coders should code this condition as a postoperative complication. Coders need to make this critical distinction to ensure that their coding is precise and accurately reflects a condition that can affect the hospital’s or physician’s quality scores.
With the increased focus on quality, it is important to report accurate postoperative complications, understand hospital-acquired conditions, and be as accurate as possible when reporting coded data that affect the quality of care a patient received.
“Coders need to know from a surgical perspective what typical outcomes are, and they must also recognize that they can’t code something unless the physician is actively treating it,” says DeAnne W. Bloomquist, RHIT, CCS, president and chief consultant at Mid-Continent Coding, Inc., in Overland Park, KS.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Comments
1 comments on “Examine postoperative condition coding ”
- Jordan (3/14/2012 at 9:08 PM)
- This is a hilarious aitrcle! As someone who has to deal with the realities of the coming change on a daily basis, it's great to laugh a little. Specificity is one major hurdle that providers will have to face in choosing codes. Several major disease categories have completely different coding rules, like diabetes. Thankfully there are tools like that make the job much easier. Readers of this aitrcle could even try out the software for free to see just what bites are in the system!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note from Hugh
- Depressing Leapfrog scores haunt hospitals
- Q/A: How should we report irradiated blood products?
- 2014 SNF Proposed Rule Analysis: Revising and rebasing the SNF market basket
- Recent Recovery Auditor activity
- Advanced practice nurses shouldn’t be left behind in meaningful use journey
- Reminder: MDS correction policy to be updated effective May 19
- Ask the expert: BIMS assessment
- Report: Nearly 10 percent of patients have C.diff at admission
- CMS issues transmittal to update the Medicare Provider Reimbursement Manual
- E-mailed
-
- Georgia hospitals scrambling to create residency positions
- Q/A: How should we report irradiated blood products?
- CMS looking for comments on molecular pathology payments
- Tip of the week: Build a successful website to impress candidates
- Applying multiple procedure payment reductions to therapy cap amounts for Critical Access Hospital (CAH) claims
- Don't burn those ICD-9-CM Manuals just yet
- Joint Commission seeks input on behavioral health home certification
- Report: Nearly 10 percent of patients have C.diff at admission
- Depressing Leapfrog scores haunt hospitals
- HCA initiative boosts flu shots among hospital workers
- Searched
