Nevada, Massachusetts, other states enacting regulations to prevent data breaches
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, October 27, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Thanks to new legislation, protecting people’s data is now of primary importance in several states. Businesses, including healthcare organizations, in Nevada, and beginning January 1, 2009, Massachusetts, need to pay more attention to protecting customer data, according to an October 16 article in the Wall Street Journal. Washington and Michigan are considering similar regulations.
Massachusetts businesses are required to encrypt customer data stored on portable devices (e.g., laptop computers) as of January, reports the newspaper. Karen Grant, chief privacy officer of the Boston-based Partners HealthCare System, Inc., told the Wall Street Journal that compliance with the regulation will cost more than $100,000.
The breach-notification legislation enacted by more than 40 states has done little to reduce security breaches, according to the newspaper. "Breach-notification laws deal with what happens after the horse leaves the barn," Daniel Crane, undersecretary of the MA Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, told the Wall Street Journal. The regulation taking effect in January should help "prevent the horse from getting out of the barn in the first place."
For more information, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Comments
0 comments on “Nevada, Massachusetts, other states enacting regulations to prevent data breaches ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched
